Eric Vanshelboim vs Daniel Khazime Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the recent performance of Khazime and Vanshelboim offers insight into their upcoming tennis match. In the past six months, Vanshelboim has excelled on his second serve, securing 42.94% of the points, slightly surpassing Khazime's 40.05%. Return game stats further highlight Vanshelboim's edge, winning 46.69% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Khazime's 45.28%.

When it comes to first serve returns, Vanshelboim again holds an advantage, with a 32.07% success rate over Khazime's 29.29%. This serves as a crucial metric when forecasting match outcomes in this head-to-head competition. Additionally, the ability to handle pressure favors Vanshelboim, who has saved 53.5% of breakpoints, while Khazime has managed to save 48.54%.

Evaluating both players' performance over the past year, Vanshelboim boasts a win rate of 57.35% (W/L 39/29), outperforming Khazime's 50% (W/L 23/23). Analyzing the statistics further, Khazime's proficiency is evident on Hard surfaces with a 53% win rate, while Vanshelboim shines on Clay, achieving a 65% success rate. Both players tend to underperform on Indoor Hard surfaces.

In terms of tournament level, both players have primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K. Vanshelboim has played against opponents with an average ranking of 435.38, while Khazime's adversaries averaged a higher rank of 320.89 over the past year. This difference in opponent quality may impact the players' performance and stats.

If the match progresses to a deciding set, Khazime holds a slight advantage, having won 73% of deciding sets as opposed to Vanshelboim's 71%. In the realm of breakpoint conversions, Vanshelboim again takes the lead, converting 40.54% of opportunities compared to Khazime's 31.37%.

In conclusion, based on the analyzed statistics, Vanshelboim holds the upper hand over Khazime in this upcoming match. It is likely that Vanshelboim will emerge victorious given his stronger performance in critical areas, including second serve points, return stats, and pressure situations.